National Mental Health Report Card 2023
Overview
Australia's National Mental Health Commission 2023 Report Card reveals concerning trends: mental health prevalence at record highs, particularly among young women (45.5% aged 16-24), while social determinants like financial stress and loneliness worsen. System performance shows mixed results with workforce shortages and cost barriers limiting access to care.
Key insights
Key Insights:
-
21.5% of Australians experienced mental disorders in 2020-2022, up from 19.5% in 2007
-
Young women most affected: 45.5% of females aged 16-24 had mental disorders
-
Psychological distress increased significantly from 10.8% (2011) to 14.4% (2022)
-
People with mental health conditions face higher discrimination, loneliness, and unemployment
-
Financial stress rising: 18.7% unable to raise $2,000 within a week
-
32% shortfall in mental health workers against national planning framework targets
-
19.3% delayed mental health care due to cost in 2022-23
-
Seclusion rates halved since 2009-10, showing some positive safety improvements
Did this resource draw on transformative evidence?
This document is not based on experiential evidence. It relies primarily on quantitative data from national surveys, government statistics, and administrative datasets (ABS, AIHW, HILDA survey, etc.). While it acknowledges the importance of lived experience perspectives, the report's findings are derived from statistical analysis rather than personal experiences or qualitative accounts.
This document is not primarily based on practice wisdom. It relies on statistical data and quantitative analysis rather than insights from practitioners' clinical experience. While it acknowledges the need to engage with "experts—including people with lived experience, carers, family and kin, governments and the sector," the current report emphasises empirical data over practitioner knowledge.
This document is heavily based on research and evaluation insights. It draws from major national studies (National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing), systematic data collections, government surveys, and evaluation reports like the Better Access Initiative Evaluation. The framework uses "empirically-based" indicators from robust, nationally available research data sources.
Feedback
Let us know if you found this resource useful.
Categories
Resource type
Evidence Summary