The document was significantly based on experiential expertise. The research team included lived experience researchers who were trained by and worked alongside other lived experience researchers. They conducted interviews, were involved in data collection and analysis, and the study specifically aimed to center consumer perspectives. However, the authors noted that future research should involve lived experience researchers in higher-level decision making from the research design stage.

The study was based on practice wisdom. The research was conducted in partnership with clinical mental health services and community mental health support providers who operate PARC services. Staff from both service types informed the study design and implementation. The evaluation aimed to provide actionable feedback for service improvement, directly incorporating the practical knowledge and experience of mental health practitioners working in sub-acute residential care settings.

The study was heavily based on research and evaluation insights. It employed rigorous mixed-methods evaluation including validated measurement tools (QPR, INSPIRE, MASS), longitudinal data collection across two time points, statistical analysis of 298 participants, and thematic analysis of qualitative responses. The study was part of a comprehensive state-wide evaluation examining effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency of PARC services, building systematically on existing evidence base.