Get Help Quick Close

Resources

banner-image-2
Get Help Quick Close

Tailored Online Physical Activity Coaching for Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Cognitive and Mental Health Concerns: Single-Arm Pre-Post Intervention Study

Overview

This paper reports the findings of EXCEL (Exercise for Cognitive Health), a 12-week tailored, home-based online physical activity pilot intervention designed to support middle-aged and older adults (aged 45–80) with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment and mild to moderate symptoms of depression or anxiety to meet national physical activity guidelines. The study measured the intervention's efficacy in promoting physical activity adoption, its acceptability, feasibility and safety, changes in dementia risk, mental health symptoms and stages of change, and the cognitive mechanisms underpinning behaviour change. The intervention combined individually tailored aerobic, strength and balance programs with fortnightly online coaching and was grounded in the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) model.

Developed by the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through a Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) grant

Individual authors

Kathryn A Ellis, Rhoda Lai, Eleanor Curran, Jennifer Southam, Rebecca Moorhead, Kay L Cox, Serafino G Mancuso, Alissa Westphal, Terence W H Chong, Thomas Rego, Victoria J Palmer, Kaarin J Anstey, Nicola T Lautenschlager

Key insights

The EXCEL study demonstrates that a tailored, 12-week home-based online physical activity program can be effective, safe and highly acceptable for middle-aged and older adults living with both cognitive concerns and mild to moderate mental health symptoms. The program produced significant improvements in physical activity guideline adherence, reductions in dementia risk, and large, clinically meaningful improvements across depression, anxiety and stress. Findings suggest that structured action planning and positive outcome expectancies are key mechanisms through which the intervention supports behaviour change.

Only 6% of participants met all applicable physical activity guidelines at the start of the program; by the end, 44% met these guidelines — a more than seven-fold increase. Participants were at least eight times more likely to meet age-appropriate guidelines for aerobic, strength and balance activities after the intervention, despite beginning with activity levels far below the Australian population average.

Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms all improved significantly and with large effect sizes (depression d=−1.31, stress d=−1.18, anxiety d=−0.89). Over 12 weeks, mean depression and stress scores shifted from the severe to the mild range, and anxiety scores moved from moderate to within the normal range. These are clinically meaningful changes for a population that experiences well-documented barriers to physical activity participation due to their mental health symptoms.

Participants experienced a statistically significant reduction in overall dementia risk (d=−0.32, P=.008) as measured by the validated CogDRisk tool. This adds to a growing body of evidence that physical activity can reduce dementia risk in high-risk populations, including those with co-occurring cognitive concerns and mental health symptoms, and demonstrates that increasing dementia knowledge is not a prerequisite for reducing dementia risk.

The program achieved a 95% completion rate, with 98% of completers rating the program as useful and 100% indicating they would recommend it to others. Safety was successfully managed through a system of email alerts and clinical panel oversight without requiring coaches to hold mental health or exercise physiology credentials themselves. These findings challenge the assumption that age is a barrier to engaging with safe and effective online physical activity interventions.

All 52 program completers rated the fortnightly online catch-up sessions as helpful to very helpful, with 79% rating them as very helpful. Attendance at these sessions was very high (89% attended all six sessions). This highlights the importance of regular, personalised contact in sustaining motivation and addressing barriers for this population, and suggests this component is central to the program's acceptability.

Significant improvements were observed in action planning (d=0.66, P=.001) and positive outcome expectancies for exercise (d=0.33, P=.02). These two cognitive mechanisms — forming concrete plans for when, where and how to exercise, and believing exercise will lead to positive outcomes — appear to play a key role in helping participants translate intentions into consistent physical activity, in line with the COM-B behaviour change framework underpinning the intervention.

Fifty-two per cent of participants moved from a lower to a higher stage of behavioural readiness, with average scores shifting from the "preparation" stage to the "action" stage. All participants who began at stage 2 (intending to start) or stage 3 (started but not regular) progressed to a later stage, suggesting the program is particularly effective at supporting people at the earlier stages of readiness to exercise.

Did this resource draw on transformative evidence?

Yes — The design of the EXCEL intervention was informed by Phase 1 of the EXCEL study, which included semistructured interviews with 21 participants to identify their needs, preferences and barriers related to physical activity. These insights shaped the tailoring of the program to address emotional regulation, confidence-building and overcoming barriers to translating intention into action. In Phase 2 (this study), participant perspectives were also captured through a post-intervention evaluation questionnaire assessing enjoyment, usefulness and usability of the program.

Yes — The intervention was designed and delivered by a multidisciplinary team including coaches from psychology, physical activity, social work and occupational therapy, with clinical oversight from psychiatrists and exercise physiologists. Coaches applied individualised behaviour change strategies — including education, motivation, reinforcement, environmental restructuring and enablement — based on clinical judgment and knowledge of each participant's needs. A clinical panel met fortnightly to monitor safety, and an exercise specialist provided additional support to participants as needed.

Yes — This paper is a single-arm pre-post pilot study evaluating the EXCEL intervention against primary and secondary outcomes including physical activity guideline adherence, dementia risk, mental health symptoms, stages of change, and cognitive mechanisms of behaviour change. The intervention was grounded in a published behaviour change framework (COM-B model), existing physical activity guidelines for older adults, and prior research on the AIBL Active Study and INDIGO trial. Quantitative analyses using validated instruments (CHAMPS, DASS-21, CogDRisk, and others) provide the primary evidence base.

How can this resource help me as a...?

Toggle audience types below to explore.

This is a peer-reviewed pilot study published in JMIR Aging. It is most directly relevant to researchers working in dementia prevention, physical activity, mental health, and digital health intervention design. The study provides outcome data, validated measurement tools, and a behaviour change framework that can inform future controlled trials.

Relevant to psychologists, psychiatrists, exercise physiologists, occupational therapists, social workers and other health professionals who work with older adults experiencing cognitive and mental health concerns. The study provides evidence for the effectiveness of tailored online coaching and practical insight into program structure, safety monitoring and behaviour change strategies.

Relevant to those developing dementia prevention policy, mental health promotion strategies, and digital health implementation frameworks. The study demonstrates a scalable, evidence-informed approach to reducing dementia risk in a high-risk population, with implications for investment in online health interventions for older Australians.

Relevant to leaders of mental health, aged care and community health services considering the implementation or commissioning of digitally delivered physical activity programs. The study addresses scalability, workforce requirements, safety systems and acceptability in real-world conditions.

Relevant to those funding or designing services for older adults with co-occurring cognitive and mental health concerns. The study provides feasibility and acceptability evidence to support commissioning decisions for community-based online physical activity interventions.

Feedback

Let us know if you found this resource useful.

Categories

Resource type

Evaluation


Target audiences

Researchers

Practitioners

Policymakers

Service Leaders

Service Commissioners


Translational research priority theme

Community-based models of care


Workforce capability

Promoting prevention, early intervention and help-seeking

Embedding evidence-informed continuous improvement

Supporting system navigation, partnerships and collaborative care

Delivering compassionate care, support and treatment

Enabling reflective and supportive ways of working

Understanding and responding to mental health crisis and suicide

Delivering holistic and collaborative assessment and care planning


Population cohort

Older Adults

Adults


Collaborative Centre core function

Service delivery

Lived Experience Participation

You might like

Related resources

Resource

Physical Activity Model for Cognitive Health

What helps people with cognitive concerns and depression or anxiety get active? This evidence-informed model identifies five key mechanisms to guide precise, targeted physical activity intervention design for dementia risk reduction.

Published 13th May 2026

Resource

Physical Activity Guidelines for Older Adults: MCI & SCD

Are older Australians with MCI or SCD getting the right physical activity advice? Explore evidence-based guidelines covering aerobic, resistance and balance training tailored to support brain health and reduce dementia risk.

Published 13th May 2026

See all resources